Compare Renault Clio V vs Renault Clio IV vs Renault Megane III

Renault Clio V

Renault Clio IV

Renault Megane III

Renault Clio VRenault Clio IVRenault Megane III
Variants
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220

Reviews

Neofiliac score19%16%20%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.