HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Clio V vs BMW i3 I01 vs Renault Twingo III facelift

Variants
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1578 mm / 62.1 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
3999 mm / 157.4 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2583 mm / 101.7 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Electric Range
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
6%
3%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.