Compare Peugeot 308 III vs Peugeot 207 vs Fiat 500 facelift
Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4367 mm / 171.9 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.30
0.362
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
EB2DTS
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
8%
25%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable transmissions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.