Compare Peugeot 508 II vs Honda Clarity vs Honda Civic 9 Sedan

Variants
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
1.6 PSE AWD AT
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
1.8 i-VTEC AT
1.8 i-VTEC

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.6 m / 37.9 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4750 mm / 187.0 in
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4545 mm / 178.9 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
16 in
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
10.6:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
142.0 hp / 105.9 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
79.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
174 Nm / 128.3 lb-ft @ 4300 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
1-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
42%
50%
21%
Pros
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Improved interior quality
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Distinct styling
  • Fuel cell
  • Reliable engines and manual transmission
Cons
  • Short full-electric range
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not meant for volume production
  • Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.