Compare Infiniti QX30 vs Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Infiniti Q30
Variants
2.0t AWD
2.2d AWD
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
1.5d
1.5d DCT
1.6t 122PS
1.6t 156PS DCT
2.0t AWD DCT
2.2d AWD DCT
2.2d DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/50 R18
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
202 mm / 8.0 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1530 mm / 60.2 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4425 mm / 174.2 in
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in | 2083 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Manual / automatic / DCT
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2019
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show
Reviews
Neofiliac score
14%
27%
44%
Pros
- Looks better than the GLA Mercedes
- Decent drivetrain reliability (better than Renault-powered Nissans)
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Better-looking than before
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Looks smart
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
- Utilitarian
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.