Compare Renault Kadjar vs Renault Captur / Kaptur (J87) vs Renault Koleos 2 / Samsung QM6 (HC)

Renault Kadjar

Renault Captur / Kaptur (J87)

Renault Koleos 2 / Samsung QM6 (HC)

Renault KadjarRenault Captur / Kaptur (J87)Renault Koleos 2 / Samsung QM6 (HC)
Variants
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score4%1%28%
Pros
  • Basic offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Coherent exterior design
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • CMiserably low engine output
  • Poor build quality
  • Horrible styling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.