Compare Toyota Camry 8 vs Toyota Camry 6 vs Toyota Avalon 3 facelift
Variants
2.0
2.5 6AT
2.5 8AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
2.4 158hp
2.4 158hp AT
2.4 167hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
3.5 268hp AT
3.5 277hp AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 297.18 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc, 281.94 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
127 mm / 5.0 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1486 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
5019 mm / 197.6 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1583.0 kg / 3489.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2819 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
98 ~ 101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.29
Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
ULEV
Engine
2GR-FE
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Power
268.0 hp / 199.8 kW @ 6200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
77.5 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
336 Nm / 247.8 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2009
2007 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
44%
42%
24%
Pros
- High reliability
- Good comfort
- Decent handling
- Robust engine options
- Proven to be exceptionally reliable
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Exceptionally reliable 2GR-FE engine
- Somewhat improved styling
- Lots of space inside
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- Bland styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Boring
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.