Compare Mercedes A-Class Sedan V177 vs Skoda Superb B5 vs Skoda Rapid
Variants
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT
1.8T
1.9 TDI 101PS
1.9 TDI 131PS
2.0
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI AT
2.8
2.8 AT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
14.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.5 deg
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
Platform
Volkswagen B5
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
136 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4549 mm / 179.1 in
4803 mm / 189.1 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2803 mm / 110.4 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
169 g/km
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
29%
13%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
- A cheaper way to get a B5.5 Passat
- Lesser rear suspensions than the B5 Audi
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Front-end a little ugly
- Too closely associated with taxi
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.