Compare Mercedes A-Class Sedan V177 vs Kia Rio 4 Sedan vs Kia Optima 2
Variants
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 CRDi
2.7 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
496 L / 17.5 cu-ft ~ 816 L / 28.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
185/65 R15
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4549 mm / 179.1 in
4384 mm / 172.6 in
4735 mm / 186.4 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1529.0 mm / 60.2 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2581 mm / 101.6 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
D4EA
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Power
130.0 hp / 96.9 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
81.7 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
161 Nm / 118.7 lb-ft @ 4850 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2017 ~ 2020
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
19%
37%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- More modern design
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.