Compare Honda Clarity vs Ford Fusion 2 facelift 2 vs Ford Taurus 6 facelift

Variants
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
1.5 EcoBoost SelectShift
Energi
2.0 EcoBoost AWD SelectShift
2.5 Duratec SelectShift
2.7 EcoBoost AWD SelectShift
2.0T
3.5
3.5 AWD
SHO

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4872 mm / 191.8 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1910 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded) | 1963 mm / 77.3 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
19 in
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SelectShift

Production

Availability
2018 ~ 2020
2013 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
50%
29%
23%
Pros
  • Distinct styling
  • Fuel cell
  • Decent reliability
  • Decent comfort
  • Good power output
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Not meant for volume production
  • Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland styling
  • Half-hearted design and build quality
  • Unreliable V6 engines (internal water pump)
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Generic exterior design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.