Compare Honda Clarity vs Skoda Superb B6 vs Skoda Superb 3 facelift

Variants
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
1.4 TSI
1.6 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4
1.8 TSI DSG
1.9 TDI
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG 4x4
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI DSG 4x4
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.5 deg
13.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
139 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4838 mm / 190.5 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2761 mm / 108.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
50%
60%
42%
Pros
  • Distinct styling
  • Fuel cell
  • Rather clean exterior styling
  • Very competitive vis-a-vis B6/B7 Passat
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Not meant for volume production
  • Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • FSI problems
  • DSG problems
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.