Compare Honda Clarity vs Toyota Avensis 3 facelift vs Honda Civic 10 Sedan

Variants
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT
2.2 D-CAT 150hp AT
2.2 D-CAT 177hp
1.0 VTEC
1.0 VTEC CVT
1.5 CVT
1.5 VTEC Turbo
1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT
1.6 i-DTEC
1.6 i-DTEC AT
2.0
2.0 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
235/45 R18
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
153 ~ 155 g/km
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
50%
22%
24%
Pros
  • Distinct styling
  • Fuel cell
  • Very reliable engines
  • Getting really fuel-efficient
  • Rather good looking
Cons
  • Not meant for volume production
  • Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring drive
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions on some models

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.