Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Skoda Octavia 4 vs Peugeot 508
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.6 e-HDi 115 6MT
1.6 HDi 115 5MT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
2.2 HDi 204 AT
HYbrid4
THP 155 6MT
THP 155 AT
VTi 120
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4792 mm / 188.7 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
91 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
37%
16%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable design
- Unreliable Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.