Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Hyundai Sonata 4 EF facelift vs Hyundai Grandeur 5 HG
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 131hp
2.0 131hp AT
2.5 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
2.4
2.4 Hybrid
2.4 GDi
3.0 GDi
3.0
3.3
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1422 mm / 56.0 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4747 mm / 186.9 in
4910 mm / 193.3 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1607.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
0.32
0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2001 ~ 2004
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
29%
32%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Improved styling
- New engine optinos
- Much improved exterior styling
- Good interior quality
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Strong engine options
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only MacPherston strut front suspensions
- Outdated transmissions
- Basic MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.