Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Honda Accord 9
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
2.0 PHEV
2.4
2.4 CVT
3.5
3.5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
11.6 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4969 mm / 195.6 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.26 ~ 0.29
0.30
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
64%
25%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Superb exterior styling
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Lack smoothness
- Unreliable engines
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Downgrade of suspension setup
- Wide use of CVTs
- No longer built with enthusiasts in mind
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.