HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi TT (8S) Roadster vs BMW Z3 M Roadster vs BMW 3 Series E93 LCI Convertible

Variants
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI DCT
2.0 TDI quattro DCT
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI 220 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 230
2.0 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 230 DCT
S50
S54
318i
320d
320d AT
320i
320i AT
325d
325d AT
325i
325i AT
330d
330d AT
330i
330i AT
335i
335i AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
210 L / 7.4 cu-ft ~ 350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.8 L / 11.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
138 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1384 mm / 54.5 in
Size | Length
4025 mm / 158.5 in
4612 mm / 181.6 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1782 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1422.0 mm / 56.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Fuel Economy
16.6 L/100km / 14.2 MPG (urban) | 7.9 L/100km / 29.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5
Engine | Stroke
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
66%
65%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Improved electronics (virtual dashboard)
  • Increased output
  • Good engines
  • Simple to work on
  • No BS driving experience
  • Supposedly more reliable, though still unreliable, engines
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Still uses dated 6-speed DCT
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very little cargo space
  • Heavier than the MX-5 and handles worse (but much more expensive)
  • Complex and unreliable top
  • Weight
  • Engine reliability issues

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.