Compare Audi RS 5 (8T) Cabriolet vs Audi A5 B9 Cabriolet facelift
Variants
35 TDI
35 TFSI
40 TDI
40 TDI MHEV quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI 190
40 TFSI 190 quattro
40 TFSI 204
45 TFSI 245 quattro
45 TFSI 265 quattro
50 TDI quattro
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 750 L / 26.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
9.7 L / 10.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
265/35 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1380 mm / 54.3 in
1384 mm / 54.5 in
Size | Length
4649 mm / 183.0 in
4697 mm / 184.9 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2020 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Weight
1920.0 kg / 4232.9 lbs
Wheel Size
9J x 19
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2764 mm / 108.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.7 sec
CO2 Emission
249 g/km
Fuel Economy
10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (combined) | 14.6 L/100km / 16.1 MPG (urban) | 8.5 L/100km / 27.7 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
CFSA
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.2 L / 254.0 cu-in / 4163.0 cc
Engine | Power
450.0 hp / 335.6 kW @ 8250 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
108.1 hp/L / 1.8 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
430 Nm / 317.2 lb-ft @ 4000-6000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic S tronic
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
65%
Pros
- Good performance
- Improved styling
- Multi-link suspensions all around
- Top-down motoring made possible for company car users
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Cons
- Front-heavy
- No more manual transmission
- Ugly
- FWD-based
- Nose-heavy
- No manual transmission
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.