Compare BMW Z3 M Roadster vs Mini F57 Convertible vs Mini R57 Convertible

Variants
S50
S54
Cooper
Cooper AT
Cooper D
Cooper D AT
Cooper S
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD AT
JCW
JCW AT
One
Cooper 120
Cooper 120 AT
Cooper 122
Cooper 122 AT
Cooper D
Cooper D AT
Cooper S 175
Cooper S 175 AT
Cooper S 184
Cooper S 184 AT
Cooper SD
Cooper SD AT
JCW
JCW AT
One
One AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
160 L / 5.7 cu-ft ~ 215 L / 7.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.8 L / 11.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1415 mm / 55.7 in
1414 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
4025 mm / 158.5 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1727 mm / 68.0 in
1683 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Front
1422.0 mm / 56.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2495 mm / 98.2 in
2467 mm / 97.1 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
16.6 L/100km / 14.2 MPG (urban) | 7.9 L/100km / 29.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Stroke
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
66%
27%
27%
Pros
  • Good engines
  • Simple to work on
  • No BS driving experience
  • Improved exterior quality
  • Improved interior quality
  • Classy styling
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very little cargo space
  • Heavier than the MX-5 and handles worse (but much more expensive)
  • Even smaller engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Inline-3 and diesel in a convertible
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Diesel nonsense in convertible

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.