Compare Mercedes C-Class Cabriolet A205 facelift vs Mercedes CLK A209 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible

Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
CLK 55 AMG
CLK 200 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor MT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 240 MT
CLK 240
CLK 320
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
L99 AT
LS3

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
285 L / 10.1 cu-ft ~ 360 L / 12.7 cu-ft
276 L / 9.7 cu-ft ~ 390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1378 mm / 54.3 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1917 mm / 75.5 in
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2852 mm / 112.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
82.1 mm / 3.2 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2018 ~ 2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
78%
67%
76%
Pros
  • Large chance to get V8 AMG in a C-Class
  • Decent styling
  • Overall good drivetrain reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Athletic design
  • Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
  • Improved drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Euro 6d nonsense
  • 4MATIC nonsense
  • Diesel nonsense
  • Some quality issues
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Handling not that great
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low side and rear visibility

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.