Compare Mercedes CLK A209 facelift Convertible vs Mercedes AMG GT Roadster vs Jaguar F-Type Convertible
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
GT
GT C
GT S
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
4
2
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
9.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
96 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1939 mm / 76.3 in | 2075 mm / 81.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Rear
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2630 mm / 103.5 in
2622 mm / 103.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.38
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
M 178 DE 40 AL
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
71%
91%
89%
Pros
- More powerful drivetrain
- Improvement in build quality
- Good performance overall
- Relatively tight and light
- Robust drivetrain
- Good performance
- Great styling
- Great handling
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Some engine reliability concerns
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
- Loss of elegance compared to the XK
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.