Compare Mercedes CLK A209 facelift Convertible vs Fiat 500C vs Renault Wind
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
0.9 TWIN AIR
1.2
1.3 MultiJet
1.4
1.2 TCe
1.6 VVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
4
4
2
Payload
415 kg / 915 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
195/45 R16, 205/40 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
3-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1488 mm / 58.6 in
1381 mm / 54.4 in
Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
3546 mm / 139.6 in
3833 mm / 150.9 in
Size | Width
1627 mm / 64.1 in
1689 mm / 66.5 in | 1913 mm / 75.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1451.0 mm / 57.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
Weight
970.0 kg / 2138.5 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
7J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2368 mm / 93.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
71%
17%
4%
Pros
- More powerful drivetrain
- Improvement in build quality
- Small turning circle
- Decent styling
- Hardtop convertible
- No diesel nonsense
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Some engine reliability concerns
- No real convertible experience
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Extremely slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Very tight inside
- Extremely ugly
- Very uncomfortable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.