Compare Mercedes CLK A209 Convertible vs BMW 3 Series E46 LCI Convertible vs BMW 3 Series E93 LCI Convertible
Variants
CLK 55 AMG
CLK 200 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor MT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 240 MT
CLK 240
CLK 320
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
318Ci
318Ci AT
320Cd
320Ci
320Ci AT
325Ci
325Ci AT
330Ci
330Ci AT
318i
320d
320d AT
320i
320i AT
325d
325d AT
325i
325i AT
330d
330d AT
330i
330i AT
335i
335i AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
276 L / 9.7 cu-ft ~ 390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
210 L / 7.4 cu-ft ~ 350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
345 kg / 761 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
138 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1384 mm / 54.5 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
4488 mm / 176.7 in
4612 mm / 181.6 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1782 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
64%
65%
Pros
- Overall good drivetrain reliability
- Decent styling
- New lights assemblies
- Decent styling with the top down
- Supposedly more reliable, though still unreliable, engines
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
- Some quality issues
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Handling not that great
- Diesel nonsense
- New meaningful engine updates
- Same AT problems as pre-facelift
- Complex and unreliable top
- Weight
- Engine reliability issues
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.