Compare Mercedes CLK A209 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 5 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 6 S550 Convertible facelift
Variants
CLK 55 AMG
CLK 200 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor MT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 240 MT
CLK 240
CLK 320
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
Mustang
Mustang GT 304
Mustang GT 324
Mustang GT 324 AT
Mustang GT 500 507
Mustang GT 500 558
Mustang GT 500 672
2.3 EcoBoost
2.3 EcoBoost AT
5.0 GT
5.0 GT AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
276 L / 9.7 cu-ft ~ 390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
275 L / 9.7 cu-ft
323 L / 11.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.3 m / 37.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
4788 mm / 188.5 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1915 mm / 75.4 in | 2080 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1933 mm / 76.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.38
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
73%
85%
Pros
- Overall good drivetrain reliability
- Decent styling
- Great V8 choices
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Improved sporty styling
- Available with V8 and manual transmission
- Handsome styling
- Good pricing
- RWD
Cons
- Some quality issues
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Handling not that great
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Basic suspension setup
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.