Compare Mercedes SLS AMG Roadster vs Mercedes SLK R171 vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible
Variants
Roadster
Final Edition GT Roadster
GT Roadster
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 Kompressor MT
SLK 200 Kompressor
SLK 280 MT
SLK 280
SLK 350 MT
SLK 350
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
173 L / 6.1 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.0 L / 14.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1261 mm / 49.6 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
Track Width | Front
1682.0 mm / 66.2 in
Wheel Size
19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2430 mm / 95.7 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
CO2 Emission
308 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
0.32
0.37
Fuel Economy
13.2 L/100km / 17.8 MPG (combined) | 19.9 L/100km / 11.8 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Euro 6 b
Engine
M 159.980
Engine | Bore
102.2 mm / 4.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.3:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 378.8 cu-in / 6208.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.6 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
650 Nm / 479.4 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
70%
80%
Pros
- Superb performance
- Gorgeous styling
- Great drivetrain reliability
- Good build quality
- Good SLK55 AMG drivetrain
- Sleek design
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
Cons
- No gull wing doors
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
- Engine problems with the M272 V6
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.