Compare Chevrolet Corvette C7 Convertible vs BMW 6 Series E64 LCI Convertible vs Alpina B6 E64

Variants
Grand Sport
Grand Sport AT
Stingray
Stingray AT
Z06
Z06 AT
ZR1
ZR1 AT
630i
630i AT
635d AT
650i
650i AT
B6
B6 S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
260 kg / 573 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1371 mm / 54.0 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Weight
1930.0 kg / 4254.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
18.9 L/100km / 12.4 MPG (combined) | 22.6 L/100km / 10.4 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
4.4 L / 268.4 cu-in / 4398.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
82.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
96%
72%
87%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Much improved handling
  • Great chassis and suspension
  • High drivetrain reliability
  • Unique 7-speed manual transmission
  • Good looks with the top down
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Superb elegance and styling
  • Good performance
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • The Targa may be more interesting
  • Poor N53 engine introduced
  • No real changes
  • Not very good looks with the top up
  • MacPherson front suspensions
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.