Compare Alpina B6 E64 vs BMW 6 Series E64 LCI Convertible vs BMW 3 Series E93 LCI Convertible
Variants
B6
B6 S
630i
630i AT
635d AT
650i
650i AT
318i
320d
320d AT
320i
320i AT
325d
325d AT
325i
325i AT
330d
330d AT
330i
330i AT
335i
335i AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
210 L / 7.4 cu-ft ~ 350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
260 kg / 573 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
138 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1371 mm / 54.0 in
1384 mm / 54.5 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4612 mm / 181.6 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
1782 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
Weight
1930.0 kg / 4254.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
18.9 L/100km / 12.4 MPG (combined) | 22.6 L/100km / 10.4 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.4 cu-in / 4398.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
82.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
2010 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
72%
65%
Pros
- Superb elegance and styling
- Good performance
- Decent handling
- Good looks with the top down
- Decent engine reliability
- Supposedly more reliable, though still unreliable, engines
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poor N53 engine introduced
- No real changes
- Not very good looks with the top up
- MacPherson front suspensions
- Complex and unreliable top
- Weight
- Engine reliability issues
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.