Compare Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Volvo C70 Convertible
Variants
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
28%
Pros
- Improved styling
- Better build quality
- Fully independent suspensions
- Characterful I5 engines
- No diesel nonsense
- Reliable drivetrain
Cons
- Tiny inline-4 engine
- Ugly with the top up and down
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.