Compare Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Toyota MR2 W30 vs Toyota Camry Solara Convertible
Variants
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2.2
3.0 198
3.0 200
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
90 L / 3.2 cu-ft
249 L / 8.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Payload
175 kg / 386 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
185/55 R15, 205/50 R15
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
1240 mm / 48.8 in
1400 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Length
3885 mm / 153.0 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1806 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1050.0 kg / 2314.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2450 mm / 96.5 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.31
Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (urban) | 6.9 L/100km / 34.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
79.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.5 cu-in / 1794.0 cc
Engine | Power
140.0 hp / 104.4 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
78.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
91.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
172 Nm / 126.9 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
1999 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
36%
54%
Pros
- Improved styling
- Better build quality
- Fully independent suspensions
- Cheap mid-engine roadster
- Small turning circle
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good interior and exterior finish
Cons
- Tiny inline-4 engine
- Miserably low engine output
- MacPherson front suspension
- Very little cargo space
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Lethargic handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.