Compare Ford Mustang 4 Convertible vs Ford Thunderbird 11
Variants
3.8 147
3.8 190
3.8 GT 152
4.6 Cobra R
4.6 Cobra
4.6 GT 215
4.6 GT 228
4.6 GT 263
5.0 GT
2001
2002+
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Double-wishbone
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1323 mm / 52.1 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheelbase
2723 mm / 107.2 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 241.0 cu-in / 3950.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
66%
Pros
- Good reliability record
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- Basic suspension setup
- Low cargo capacity
- Down on power
- Inefficient
- Somewhat strange looking
- Does not handle well
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.