HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Jaguar F-Type Convertible vs BMW 6 Series E64 Convertible vs Alpina B6 E64

Variants
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
630i
630i AT
645Ci
645Ci AT
650i
650i AT
B6
B6 S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.2 L / 15.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
260 kg / 573 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1373 mm / 54.1 in
1371 mm / 54.0 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Weight
1930.0 kg / 4254.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2622 mm / 103.2 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
18.9 L/100km / 12.4 MPG (combined) | 22.6 L/100km / 10.4 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.4 cu-in / 4398.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
82.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
89%
72%
87%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great styling
  • Great handling
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Decent looks with the top down
  • Superb elegance and styling
  • Good performance
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • Loss of elegance compared to the XK
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not very good looking with the top up
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.