Compare Jaguar F-Type Convertible vs Alpina B6 F12 vs Alpina B6 E64

Variants
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
B6 Bi-Turbo
B6 Bi-Turbo EDITION 50
B6
B6 S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
410 kg / 904 lbs
260 kg / 573 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1371 mm / 54.0 in
Size | Length
4894 mm / 192.7 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Weight
2020.0 kg / 4453.3 lbs
1930.0 kg / 4254.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2622 mm / 103.2 in
2855 mm / 112.4 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
224 g/km
Fuel Economy
9.6 L/100km / 24.5 MPG (combined) | 13.2 L/100km / 17.8 MPG (urban) | 7.5 L/100km / 31.4 MPG (highway)
18.9 L/100km / 12.4 MPG (combined) | 22.6 L/100km / 10.4 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.2 cu-in / 4395.0 cc
4.4 L / 268.4 cu-in / 4398.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
82.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Switch-Tronic
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
89%
84%
87%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great styling
  • Great handling
  • Superb level of torque
  • Good performance
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspensions
  • Superb elegance and styling
  • Good performance
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • Loss of elegance compared to the XK
  • Worse handling despite having double-wishbone front suspensions
  • Even lower engine reliability
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.