Compare Saab 9-3 Convertible vs Peugeot 307 CC
Variants
2.0T 185
2.0T 205
2.3i 150 AT
2.3T 230
2.3i 150
1.6i
2.0 HDi
2.0i 136
2.0i 136 AT
2.0i 177
2.0i 140
2.0i 140 AT
2.0i 177
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
295 L / 10.4 cu-ft ~ 378 L / 13.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Length
4629 mm / 182.2 in
Size | Width
1711 mm / 67.4 in
1759 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1497.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1442.0 mm / 56.8 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
20%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Decent reliability
- Easy and cheap to fix
- Hardtop convertible
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Awkard profile
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.