Compare Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 Coupe vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class C238 Coupe vs Audi A5 B9 (F5) facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 Coupe

Mercedes-Benz E-Class C238 Coupe

Audi A5 B9 (F5) facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 CoupeMercedes-Benz E-Class C238 CoupeAudi A5 B9 (F5) facelift
Variants
S 63 AMG 4MATIC
S 63 AMG
S 65 AMG
S 400 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC
S 500
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
E 200 4MATIC
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 Euro6d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 220d
E 300
E 300 Euro6d
E 300d
E 350
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 Euro6d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
35 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TFSI MT
40 TDI 190
40 TDI 204
40 TDI 204 quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI 190
40 TFSI 204
40 TFSI 204 quattro
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI 245 quattro
45 TFSI 265 quattro
50 TDI quattro AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score92%73%57%
Pros
  • Updated M279 V12
  • Luxurious interior
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Rather good styling
  • S65 AMG remained RWD
  • Improve front-end styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • AWD nonsense
  • No S600 Coupe
  • Smaller than the C216
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Poor rear-end styling
  • Downsized engines
  • Too complex for no tangible benefits
  • Questionable reliability
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.