Compare Mercedes CLK C209 facelift vs Mercedes C-Class Coupe C204 vs Lexus RC facelift

Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT
C 200
C 200 AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 250 AT
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI AT
C 350 AT
C 63 AMG
C 63 AMG Black Series
C 63 AMG Edition 507
C 63 AMG Performance
RC 300
RC 300 AWD
RC 350 AWD
RC 350
RC F

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
294 L / 10.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1406 mm / 55.4 in
Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.1 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
79%
75%
88%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
  • Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather robust drivetrain
  • Wonderful V8 engine
  • RWD setup
  • Smart styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lower grade of build than the CLK
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Tight interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.