Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class C238 Coupe vs Audi A5 B9 (F5) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209

Mercedes-Benz E-Class C238 Coupe

Audi A5 B9 (F5) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209Mercedes-Benz E-Class C238 CoupeAudi A5 B9 (F5) facelift
Variants
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
E 200 4MATIC
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 Euro6d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 220d
E 300
E 300 Euro6d
E 300d
E 350
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 Euro6d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
35 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TFSI MT
40 TDI 190
40 TDI 204
40 TDI 204 quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI 190
40 TFSI 204
40 TFSI 204 quattro
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI 245 quattro
45 TFSI 265 quattro
50 TDI quattro AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score72%73%57%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Robust engine lineup
  • Improve front-end styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor rear-end styling
  • Downsized engines
  • Too complex for no tangible benefits
  • Questionable reliability
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.