Compare Mercedes CLS C218 facelift vs Mercedes E-class W213 vs Mercedes A-Class Sedan V177
Variants
CLS 63 AMG
CLS 63 AMG 4MATIC
CLS 63 AMG S 4MATIC
CLS 220 BlueTEC
CLS 250 BlueTEC
CLS 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC
CLS 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
CLS 350 BlueTEC
CLS 400
CLS 400 4MATIC
CLS 500
CLS 500 4MATIC
AMG E 43 4MATIC
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 MT
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 250
E 300
E 300 Euro6d
E 300d
E 300de PHEV
E 300e PHEV
E 350
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 350d Euro6d
E 350e PHEV
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.3 deg
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.4 deg
15.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
95 mm / 3.7 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1418 mm / 55.8 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4937 mm / 194.4 in
4549 mm / 179.1 in
Track Width | Front
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1626.0 mm / 64.0 in
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2939 mm / 115.7 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
80%
36%
Pros
- New 9G TRONIC transmission
- Good engine lineup
- Undeniably great performance figures
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Multi-link suspension setup all-around
- Decent performance
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible styling
- Disastrous impact on the car industry as the lead hunchback
- AWD (4MATIC) is forced on consumers
- Somewhat genertic styling
- Downsized engined with lots of electronics
- Too many displays (and distractions) inside
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.