Compare Mercedes AMG GT C190 vs Mercedes CLK C209 facelift vs Ford Mustang 5
Variants
GT
GTS
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT
3.7
3.7 AT
4.0
4.0 AT
GT 4.6
GT 4.6 AT
Shelby GT500 5.4 540
Shelby GT500 5.4 500
Shelby GT500 5.8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
9.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Solid axle
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
98 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1288 mm / 50.7 in
Size | Length
4546 mm / 179.0 in
4652 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1939 mm / 76.3 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1680.0 mm / 66.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
Wheelbase
2630 mm / 103.5 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.35
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine
M 178 DE 40 AL
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
79%
75%
Pros
- Quick and fast
- More affordable than the SLS
- Sensuous styling
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Robust drivetrain
- Superb exterior styling
- Great V8 choices
- Manual widely available
- Front-engine, RWD
Cons
- No longer stands out
- Less desirable engine
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.