Compare Acura RSX vs Honda Accord 9 Coupe
Variants
Type R
AT
2.4
2.4 CVT
3.5
3.5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
504 L / 17.8 cu-ft
379 L / 13.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
Payload
230 kg / 507 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1380 mm / 54.3 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4385 mm / 172.6 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Weight
1170.0 kg / 2579.4 lbs
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2001 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
64%
Pros
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Decent styling
- Good exterior styling
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good engine reliability
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.