Compare Hyundai Genesis Coupe facelift vs Hyundai Elantra 5 Coupe
Variants
2.0 TCi
2.0 TCi AT
3.8
3.8 AT
3.8 GDi
3.8 GDi AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/45 R17
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1385 mm / 54.5 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4630 mm / 182.3 in
4539 mm / 178.7 in
Size | Width
1865 mm / 73.4 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Weight
1238.0 kg / 2729.3 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2820 mm / 111.0 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
40.3 m / 132.2 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.4 L/100km / 31.8 MPG (combined) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (urban) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2016
2012 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
46%
18%
Pros
- New engine options
- More power than pre-facelift
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Long-term reliability concerns
- Awkward styling
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.