Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 facelift vs Chevrolet Corvette C6 vs Jaguar XK X150
Variants
SS
SS AT
Z/28
LS2
LS2 AT
LS3
LS3 AT
Z06
ZR1
4.2
5.0
XKR 4.2
XKR 5.0
XKR-S
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2752 mm / 108.3 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
89%
82%
Pros
- Imcreased engine output
- Newer, more aggressive front-end design
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Excellent power output
- Manual transmission widely available
- Great styling
- Double-wishbone suspensions all around
- Supercharged V8 power
- Improved reliability
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- Some fit and finish issues
- Lower grade of build
- Less beautiful
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.