Compare Volkswagen Scirocco 3 vs Mercedes A-Class W176 vs Mercedes CLC CL203

Variants
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 160
1.4 TSI 160 DSG
2.0 TDI 140
2.0 TDI 140 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 170
2.0 TDI 170 DSG
2.0 TDI 177
2.0 TDI 177 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 180
2.0 TSI 180 DSG
2.0 TSI 200
2.0 TSI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 210
2.0 TSI 210 DSG
2.0 TSI GTS
2.0 TSI GTS DSG
Scirocco R 265
Scirocco R 265 DSG
Scirocco R 280
Scirocco R 280 DSG
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI DCT
A 180
A 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
A 180 DCT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI DCT
A 200
A 200 DCT
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI DCT
A 220 CDI DCT
A 250 4MATIC
A 250 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 45 AMG
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
341 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1157 L / 40.9 cu-ft
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1433 mm / 56.4 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
4292 mm / 169.0 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
51%
42%
31%
Pros
  • Good styling for a hatchback
  • Reasonably good handling
  • Lots of power in the Scirocco R
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Much improved styling
  • Much improved fit and finish
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some reliability concerns
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • 4-cylinder AMG
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.