Compare Maserati Coupe vs BMW 8 Series G15 vs Maserati GranTurismo

Variants
Coupe
GranSport
840d Euro6d xDrive
840d xDrive
840i
840i Euro6d
840i Euro6d xDrive
840i xDrive
M850i Euro6d xDrive
M850i xDrive
GranTurismo
GranTurismo MC Stradale
GranTurismo S
GranTurismo Sport
GranTurismo Sport AMT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
88.0 L / 23.2 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
370 kg / 816 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
245/40 R19, 285/35 R19
Turning Circle
11.9 m

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm
Size | Length
4523 mm / 178.1 in
Size | Width
1822 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1627.0 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
1642.0 mm / 64.6 in
Wheel Size
8J x 19, 9.5J x 19
8.5J x 19, 10.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2822 mm / 111.1 in
2942 mm / 115.8 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.0 m / 108.2 ft
Fuel Economy
15.9 L/100km / 14.8 MPG (combined) | 25.0 L/100km / 9.4 MPG (urban) | 11.0 L/100km / 21.4 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
4.2 L / 259.0 cu-in / 4244.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7200 rpm
Engine | Torque
451 Nm / 332.6 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Debut
2018-06
Made In
Germany

Reviews

Neofiliac score
82%
87%
93%
Pros
  • Elegant Maserati styling
  • Superb V8 engine
  • Great double-wishbone suspension setup
  • Rather good styling
  • Down to great 3.7s 0-100kph time
  • Good performance-to-consumption ratio
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Sexy styling
  • Superb engine characteristics
  • Great handling
  • Fine interior
Cons
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrible automated manual transmission
  • Looks too much like a Mustang
  • Reliability concerns
  • AWD
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Some ergonomics issues

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.