Compare SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe vs Hyundai i20 vs Toyota Yaris 3

SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe 3-door Hatchback (2008-2017)

Toyota Yaris 3 / Vitz (XP130) Hatchback (2011-2018)

SEAT | Cars

Hyundai Motor | Cars

Toyota | Cars

Variants

1.0 75

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 70 Euro5

1.2 TDI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 85

1.4 85 Euro5

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 80

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra

1.4 TSI 140

1.4 TSI 150

1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR

1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra

1.6 105

1.6 105 DSG

1.6 81

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.8 TSI 192 Cupra

1.9 TDI 105

1.9 TDI 90

2.0 TDI 143

2.0 TDI 143 FR

1.0 T-GDi 100

1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT

1.0 T-GDi 120

1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT

1.2 MPi

i20 N

1.0

1.33

1.33 Euro6

1.33 Euro6 CVT

1.33 CVT

1.4 D-4D Euro6

1.4 D-4D

1.4

Hybrid Euro6

1.5

1.5 CVT

Hybrid

GRMN

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

0.0 L / 0.0 qt

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

40.0 L / 10.6 gal

Passengers

Payload

430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc, 320 mm

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc, 262 mm

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Torsion

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Tire Size

215/40 R18

Turning Circle

10.5 m / 34.6 ft

Dimensions

Size | Height

1510 mm / 59.4 in

Size | Width

1693 mm / 66.7 in

1695 mm / 66.7 in

Track Width | Front

1544.0 mm / 60.8 in

Track Width | Rear

1541.0 mm / 60.7 in

Weight

1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs

Wheelbase

2469 mm / 97.2 in

2580 mm / 101.6 in

2510 mm / 98.8 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

33.9 m / 111.2 ft

CO2 Emission

158 g/km

Fuel Economy

7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)

Top Speed

229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph

Towing Capacity

450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6d

Engine | Bore

75.6 mm / 3.0 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.0:1

Engine | Stroke

89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

17%

35%

21%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Decent styling
Low fuel consumption

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Basic suspension setup
Somewhat ugly
Only available with small engines

Only available with tiny engines
Basic suspension setup
Low build quality

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.