Compare Toyota Sequoia vs Ford Expedition 2 vs Ford Bronco Sport
Variants
4.7 AWD
4.7 RWD
4.7 VVT-i AWD
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4 263 4WD
5.4 263
5.4 304
5.4 304 4WD
1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
571 L / 20.2 cu-ft ~ 1723 L / 60.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
99.0 L / 26.2 gal
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
8
5
Payload
650 kg / 1433 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Independent, spring
Tire Size
265/70 R17
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Platform
Ford C2
Trim Levels
Base, Big Bend, Outer Banks, Badlands and First Edition
Dimensions
Size | Height
1860 mm / 73.2 in
1971 mm / 77.6 in
Size | Length
5180 mm / 203.9 in
5228 mm / 205.8 in
4387 mm / 172.7 in
Size | Width
1980 mm / 78.0 in
2000 mm / 78.7 in
1887 mm / 74.3 in | 2088 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1938 mm / 76.3 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1675.0 mm / 65.9 in
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1680.0 mm / 66.1 in
1709.0 mm / 67.3 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Weight
2300.0 kg / 5070.6 lbs
Wheelbase
3000 mm / 118.1 in
3023 mm / 119.0 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
12.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
12.2 sec
Top Speed
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
4.7 L / 284.6 cu-in / 4664.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
52.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
427 Nm / 314.9 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2020-07-13
Made In
Mexico
Reviews
Neofiliac score
76%
58%
39%
Pros
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Very high cargo capacity
- Stout drivetrain
- Considerable offroad capabilities
- Lots of space inside
- Some offroad capabilities
- Decent styling for a crossover
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Worse offroad capabilities than the Land Cruiser
- Bland styling
- Poor fuel economy
- Sluggish acceleration
- Poor handling
- Bland styling
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.