Compare Range Rover Velar vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Peugeot 3008 II

Variants
D180
D240
D275
D300
P250
P300
P340
P380
SVAutobiography Dynamic
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
10.7 m / 35.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Wheel Size
21 in, 22 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
27%
21%
Pros
  • Available with Supercharged V8
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
  • Overall smart styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Not real Range Rover
  • Low reliability
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.