Compare Land Rover Freelander 2 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs BMW X3 G01 LCI
Variants
2.0 GTDi AWD AT
2.2 eD4
2.2 SD4 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 150 AWD
2.2 TD4 150 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 160
2.2 TD4 160 AT
3.2
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
20d
20i
30d
30e
30i
M40d
M40i
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
755 L / 26.7 cu-ft ~ 1670 L / 59.0 cu-ft
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
735 kg / 1620 lbs
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
25.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/75 R16
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
225/60 R18 104W XL
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Compact Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
204 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1676 mm / 66.0 in
Size | Length
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Track Width | Front
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2864 mm / 112.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
42.0 km / 26.1 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6d
Engine
B48B20
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-06-09
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
27%
57%
Pros
- Decent drivetrain reliability (rare for an LR)
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent performance
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Rather ugly
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Tiny engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.