Compare Land Rover Freelander 2 vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Range Rover Evoque L551

Variants
2.0 GTDi AWD AT
2.2 eD4
2.2 SD4 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 150 AWD
2.2 TD4 150 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 160
2.2 TD4 160 AT
3.2
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
755 L / 26.7 cu-ft ~ 1670 L / 59.0 cu-ft
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
735 kg / 1620 lbs
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/75 R16
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1648 mm / 64.9 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in

Performance

Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
35%
27%
Pros
  • Decent drivetrain reliability (rare for an LR)
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Rather ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.