Compare Kia Niro vs Kia Sportage 5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2 facelift

Variants
1.6 GDI Hybrid
1.6 GDI Euro6d Hybrid
1.6 GDI PHEV
1.6 GDI Euro6d PHEV
1.6 CRDi 116 MT
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 MT
1.6 T-GDi 180 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 180 DCT
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD
2.0 CRDi AT
2.0 CRDi AWD AT
2.0 MPI AT
2.0 MPI MT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 GDI AWD AT
1.4 TSI eHybrid DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 245 4MOTION DSG
Tiguan R
1.5 TSI 150 DSG R-Line
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG R-Line

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross) | 10.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Lithium-polymer
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
Compact crossover
Platform
Hyundai-Kia N3

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Length
4355 mm / 171.5 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
59.0 km / 36.7 mi
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
G4LE
G4KIII
Engine | Bore
72.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
147 Nm / 108.4 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm + 170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft @ 0-1798 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2021-06-08
Made In
South Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score
38%
32%
19%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent interior
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engines
  • Down to very low 1.8L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Very ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.