Compare Ford Explorer 4 vs Ford Expedition 2
Variants
4.0 212
4.0 208
4.0 208 4WD
4.0 212 4WD
4.6
4.6 4WD
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4 263 4WD
5.4 263
5.4 304
5.4 304 4WD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
571 L / 20.2 cu-ft ~ 1723 L / 60.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
Passengers
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid-axle
Solid axle
Tire Size
265/70 R17
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1971 mm / 77.6 in
Size | Length
5228 mm / 205.8 in
Size | Width
2000 mm / 78.7 in
Track Width | Front
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1709.0 mm / 67.3 in
Wheelbase
3023 mm / 119.0 in
Powertrain
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
58%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Stout drivetrain
- Considerable offroad capabilities
- Lots of space inside
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Poor fuel economy
- Sluggish acceleration
- Poor handling
- Bland styling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.