Compare Chevrolet Captiva vs Honda CR-V 3 vs Honda Pilot 2
Variants
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
2.0 VTEC
2.0 VTEC Euro5
2.0 VTEC AT
2.0 VTEC Euro5 AT
2.2 CDTi
2.2 DTEC
2.2 DTEC AT
2.4 VTEC AT
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
79.0 L / 20.9 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 330 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 333 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2620 mm / 103.1 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35Z4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm
Engine | Redline
6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
33%
34%
Pros
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
- Improved styling
- Great engine reliability
- Good manual transmission
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- High engine reliability
Cons
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Quite ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.